The Voice of Satanism

Who was the first civilization?
Answer: Not Sumerian, yet was it?
Commentary by Grand Magister Blackwood.

This is the age old question that permeates the “Wilds of Satanism,” people offer up to the pyres many definitive answers taken from Wikipedia, which I remind you is a editable source and can easily be changed by those from outside the scholarly circles, allowing edits to the writers liking instead of historical evidence that will point somewhere or everywhere for people trying reinforce possible their own goals, now some can say this about the Sumerian’s as people have “Circled the Wagons” and put up a bevy of supportive and informative documents and relevant historical interpretations of what is real and what is false.
To answer this “Age Old”question we must travel far far back and examine archeology and even religious theology to offer a glimpse into what is real and what is comprehended to early civilization and how early if formed ideologies and systems of faith.

To offer up some clarity I have poured over numerous documents and “painstakingly” put together one thing most people are always pondering, and unlike most in Satanism I despite being known as “The Most Hated Man in Satanism,” will offer up something the critic’s which number few will not take the time to research or spend the time to explain because it might bruise an ego or two or three or perhaps expose something that is not so very real with them.

But I am not alone in my opinions and observation’s as I have gleaned much of what I see as wisdom from the not my own ideologies but people who are held in respect in Theology and Archeology and Civilization Studies which are far more intellectual and intelligent than myself, yet I am able to break down and provide commentary which stays very much in line with what the scholars tend to view as factual information, and despite being open for further debate, the time line established years ago by more people relevant to even myself, making the following almost nearly “dead-on.”

Now some scholars come into view saying India was the first civilizations, and others say Africa, I will examine a few things to provide the reader a base to debate fully the Arc of Civilization’s and provide at least a plausible answer.

Now Archeologists will not debate that man and woman have been around long before 90,000 B.C. And used tools and metallurgy and created fires, and invented things, and even civilizations predating Sumeria buried their dead and had religious ceremonies for their dead, however there is a few key elements that fail to appear in all of these civilizations except for Sumer, who spoke as well of coming from the Sea meaning they settles the Indus Valley along side other civilizations which preferred the fertile soils of the Indus Valley Region extending from the Middle East, Eastward.

And Africa did have many advancements, which predated the area know as Mesopotamia, yet some key actions and constructs fail to appear in their cultures making them obscure at best, and at the end of day this is not racism extended as giving credit where credit is due in the observations of civilizations and how they evolved.

It is known fact that man or woman first probably appeared in Ethiopia, yet did not remain in the region exploring and pushing further North, which is only logical as they explored out sources for materials and foods to drive small villages and small cities that lacked important things that I will explain that created a religious culture.
Here where it all begins to take a big turn, with Yemen being closer and the land mass being vastly different it can be said that these early people from Ethiopia could have traveled to a much closer Turkish Region or Mesopotamia which included Turkey, but lets examine Egypt again.

Egypt was very different than Egypt of 3500 or even 2000 it was a place which was comprised of small structures and small villages nestled along the banks of the Nile, but this can never be taken as simplicity or even lack of invention or lack of religion, however no records have been found regarding the practices of these early villages along the Nile.

This again doesn’t take away from what these people knew or what they didn’t know and the excuse of the destruction of the Library of Alexandria is not a definitive, answer to why this region did not leave records, because people of region traded with one another and someone, somewhere would have had some parchment, clay tablet, cone, or anything other than stone structures rotted with age.

Jericho also had a great city state a walled city that was active in 6500 BC and overall civilizations did exist prior, and Archeologist’s locked in combat still think man and woman walked around in the Million B.C. Time Period yet left very little artifacts to prove a few important traits I will explain further along.

But aside from Jericho there where older civilizations in Damascus and Asia Minor but neither could provide the relevance to the Sumerian’s or Egyptian’s, and even in Mesopotamia there was a civilization that dated 7000 B.C.
These people where known as the Jarmo People and the people of Asia Minor had a few things in common with Jericho, a walled city state yet in all probability had no governmental or religious structure,they commonly erected walls and structures as protection from raiders from other tribes and of course the abundant wildlife that flourished everywhere and preyed upon the early man and woman.

But just what did Egypt and Sumeria have over everyone and what made them so special and relevant to Satanism, or even Neo Paganism or Paganism?

Egypt did have many wonders as Sumerian and both cultures were evolving structurally as well as inventing tools and forging techniques, so again I ask myself what separates these two from everyone else in the known civilized world?

Jericho, Damascus and other city states that dotted the globe including Africa lacked a system of government and mainly were trade posts that lacked overall definitive languages an systems of heir achy, which Sumerian’s and Egyptians both had, but that of course isn’t enough to settle this.

But unlike Egypt that was constructing monoliths and statuary before some of the Babylonian City States rose, they lacked a few key things that make Sumerian’s more relevant than Egyptian’s and truth be told they shared trade routes so I believe the Sumerian’s who were far more advanced taught the Egyptian’s a lot of the technologies they developed but a few first graced Sumerian’s and not Egyptian’s or even those who resided in India or Africa.

The Archeologist’s and Paleontologists, have formulated that the Sumerian’s had:
1. The First Kings.
2. The First Organized Governmental Structure.
3. The First Organized Army with Training.
4. Architects and Astronomers.
5. Artisan’s of the Government
6. Scientists and Hierarchy and Class Systems.
7. Blacksmiths and Public Buildings.
8. First Canals and Irrigation Systems.
9. The First Know Writings
10. The First Paid Jobs, along with Slavery.
11. Cuneiform.

Now much can be said but clearly there is an argument as to the factually of the time lines and starting point and ending points of civilizations, yet Egypt creating many advancements that were unique to the known world began such after Sumerian’s.

Both Egyptian’s and Sumerian’s had religious temples and monoliths yet, all in all we should examine one clear thing the entire system of the deities, which are almost similar and do contain recasts, yet somethings stand out.
Egyptian Gods and Goddesses change as Pharaoh’s change.
Sumerian Gods and Goddesses do not, names change.
So we also see recent man and woman change Egyptian Lore with the entry of Evil, a concept that points to Persia, with Abhura Mazda and Zoroastrian influence that formed the psychology of Evil,not Egypt so for them to have Evil Gods and Goddesses perhaps a different title is deserved.
Or was the formula or ideologies developed later when Zoroastrian Prophets traveled to the Egyptian Kingdoms?

But even Sumerian’s came from somewhere else on the planet, as they speak of coming by sea, and no one really knows when exactly that was, some scholars say 11,000 making them certainly the oldest definitive civilization based on the 11 accomplishments above, and perhaps they had the eleven great discoveries at that point it can only be assumed however as the Sumerian’s impacted many civilizations.

There are many in Satanism that have failed to examine anything other than Zachariah Stichen, who like me are left to interpret other peoples ideologies, but unlike most in this religion I do read and speak with people who are well versed on this topic as I seek to reveal a Root of Satanism, more than just a theory, but possible something that is important for our religion and this “Most Hated Man in Satanism” is not staying so stagnant as many others I am exploring for you and the truth will reveal itself for everyone, but not in a Prophetic Doctrine or “Spine Chilling Sinister Diatribe” but in a relevant and easy understood study.

So who had Satan first?
Most would agree Sumerian’s!
Hail Satan
Grand Magister Blackwood