The Voice of Satanism

From the Desk of Grand Magister Blackwood Founder Church of Theistic Satanism:
2010 what a year!

For years I have ventured throughout the United States and visited with just about every type, kind, race, and belief of Satanist, Wicca, and Pagan and even some Neo-Pagan’s to boot.
One thing I found very clear there are allot of people who are caught in some type of “Dark World” thinking that the deity Satan (which is a man made term for a much older deity) is from the “Dark World” and represents some format of evil.
Let’s go on a historical journey that will slightly reveal his true nature, not just because I said so, but I agree with those of us who throughout the ages have described Satan, and while this name as I said earlier is merely a name created for a deity who is much older than Christianity, and even older than Witchcraft and Islam.
His very roots suggest stepping from the Mesopotamian Region sometime in the early 4500 B.C. Period and after scholars and theologians deciphered the Sumerian Lore, they all seem to agree, the deity we call Satan is not of a nature of destruction and or “evil” which by the way was invented almost 2500 years after the first ideologies of a deity who resembled Satan came to text.
This is not to argue who was first the “chicken or the egg” however don’t take my word for it at all read the literally thousands of studies and theologians papers on recast’s and religions, and civilizations and you too will become truly clear with the birth of Satan in Ancient Civilizations.
But lets examine who Satan is not!
1.Satan is not Enki.
2.Satan is not Set.
3.Satan is not Marduk.
4.Satan is not Leviathan.
5.Satan is not Lucifer.
I will not apologize for bursting anyone’s bubble, nor will I debate this “painstaking” research I will invite you to do the same, or realize this argument is not debatable in anyway whatsoever.
The Temples of Satan is involved in two projects that no Theistic Satanic Church has ever completed, let alone ever started, we are building a Church and researching Satan’s Roots, not pouring people some colored drinks in a Styrofoam® cup.
But these tasks are ready for anyone else in Theistic Satanism as well to take up the task in, we are without a doubt the Church which will change the face of Ancient Religion and the concept of Satan forever and for the betterment of all those who ever believed in the deity we have grown love and practice a deep rooted faith in Satan.
Knowing if La Vey lived today I could easily destroy his weak and Atheistic Doctrines which mixed a form of “Hippie Movement” and “Atheism” mixed with some Witchcraft.
People must move past all the rhetoric and falsehoods that surround Satan and the people who described him even today, as Lucifer, or even Asmodeus both are incorrect, and return to reading the Books of the Ancient’s to discover for themselves what is real and what is falsehood regarding the deity known as Satan.
So I ask those people who are not that far gone to toss out the Lovecraft, the La Vey and read some people who really had a clue including myself, who people love to hate because as always I hold people to some proverbial mirror and expose the truth as I walk the path of Satan and do not waiver, my family, my friends, my contractors all know my faith and I am proud, so I will share.
But let’s get back to who Satan is!
1. Satan is the Deity of Knowledge and Magic.
2. His symbol is most likely the serpent, not some silly goat head.
3. Satan controls a balance, preferring to venture at nightfall, he can assume any force and roam freely in both light and dark, and astral travel at will.
4. Satan is not a deity that accepts those who refuse to take personal responsibility for their actions, and who roam aimlessly around crying the blues and whining about things they can fix with some actions.
5. Satan doesn’t hand out Sunday Pick’s or Lottery Ticket’s.
6. Satan does require prayer and faith.
7. Satan grows as people come to his faith, his power declines and people move away.
8. Satan is unaffected by other deities magic and especially Christianity or Islam, finding the spell casters who wield such magic as laughable at best.
9. Satan hates weak people, crying little kids in adult bodies are not his soldiers.
10. Satan requires a commitment, faith and most of all the knowledge that he is the power, not the magician who chants his name.
These points are again taken not just from my experiences but people throughout the ages, and far outweigh all other ideologies that have been presented before or will be presented after, they are a sort of compilation of people who are often wiser than even myself or even the reader.
People have seen Satan, I have but not in human form, in energy and in a light, as figures of mist, as many others have seen him, yet for those who refuse to believe I can’t teach you, or even begin to help you understand positive mental attitudes towards belief.
For those who believe almost always they will find themselves in contact with Satan, as his hand is often times the deciding factor in most peoples lives.
Satan is not a Vampire, I personally think Satan probably would despise Vampires, so garlic, crosses and nails through the heart cannot destroy him, he has been here with us for thousands of years.
But Christianity and even Paganism have held him back, just to name a few of the World Religions that have weakened Satan.
No longer Theistic Satanism is a movement that Modern Satanism (the belief in acting like a Satan, not an actual deity)could have never seem coming, and while people have came from Modern Satanism into Paganism, and other religion’s acting like righteous Atheist’s we have not, we pick our battles, like Oppressive Islam and other causes including purging our own religion’s of zealots and harlots that are motivated by nothing more than Facebook Fans or YouTube video prominence.
While these are great network avenues and we use them as well frequently there is more to our religion, a burning desire that envelopes those who find Satan as their deity, and experience,in faith unrivaled in any form a magical study.
An another thing I will express, to these White Witches and White Light “weak at best magician’s” we as Theistic Satanist’s embody a power from our deity that you will always fail to fend off, the power can consume people like nothing you have ever experienced, and I suggest next time, you try a proverbial “love spell” which I find laughable at best realize the hand that is playing a part in the magic is Satan as he is the Deity of Magic and Knowledge, not some weakened down “barbed tail” Christian Myth or some weakened by folklore deity, he is the cornerstone of your works, and he deserves respect that few magician’s ever can wrap their heads around.
I have lived for over forty years with Satan is my heart and never once have I felt the blade of someone s magic, no O.T.O. To Temples of Set, no Hermetic, no Witch, no Druid, no one why do suppose, with all my conflicts I have remained so successful?
Because Satan honors those who have faith in him, and serve, not as a slave but as a soldier.
Next time someone attempts to throw green magic or some form of weak magic formulated from “Snake Oil Salespeople Witchcraft” or even “Hippie Magic” realize this don’t take my word for it do some research beyond one or two books you bought seven years ago, spend some time and read it does help your mind,more than taking some person on a video’s word for something.
Get a spine, grow some balls and approach magic with the understanding it is not Venus, or Thor guiding the hand of magic in this world it is Satan, and some study will reveal this to you as well.
Hail Satanist’s!
GMB

No human has ever proclaimed him or herself potent enough in magic to raise the “Veil of Magic” far enough to provide universal understanding.
And a human tendering such a claim teaching should be rendered a hoax.
Satan the “adversary” remains a myth spawned to fool those whom wish to
elevate Jehovah to a forgiving mythological God and dissolve the idea that
Jehovah was “Evil”, No where in Ancient Biblical Hebrew does Satan appear
other than an adversary, but from the Sands of Sumeria he does!
We should realize that Satan is different from some of historical misguiding and scholars descriptions he is more liken to Intellectual and benevolent deity in control of magic and chaos around his planet.

For some reason many Satanists have abandoned the ideas of a Deity
and fell victim to rants and false doctrines of the pair of Dee’s and Kelly whom
were nothing more than “Crystal Ball and Philosopher’s Stone Salesmen”, or some agenda created by Anton La Vey (Howard Stanton Levy).

Later transferred by mixing Masonic and Angelic texts into a mush that the
“Occultists Could Digest” , by Crowley, who after careful study was as mad
as his writings, or should I say misguiding.

Then came Howard Stanton Levey with his theatrical presentation of Satanic
Rituals which where about as well written as his Organ Music.

Much coming “Now Twisted” arcane texts by “Sales Manager” Dee’s and
his willing Apprentice Kelly, these texts should be abandoned for the mush they are.

Many in Satanism continue to feed the “Hungry Infant Satanist” which this
mush, I have often thought Gerber should make a baby food named “False
Doctrine Mush”.

I as many of you desire more from this “Science” I brand it this because it must have further study, I admire those whom continue this study and teach
those “New To Satanism” the correct paths and not those of “Traditional Falsehoods”, or “Occult Salesmen”.
I and others in Satanism continue to develop and strip the “Old Doctrines” away, bringing new information into the hands of the strong and educated Theistic Satanist.
I look around and realize “It’s My Time Now” as Al Pacino said in the great movie Devil’s Advocate.

Hail Satan!
Grand Magister Blackwood

Grand Magister Blackwood examines the Code of Hammurabi a Sumerian Codex of Life
For those who claim the Mesopotamia Culture was so ignorant I provide a extensive base line of evidence in this report and repost.
The material for the study of Babylonian law is singularly extensive without being exhaustive. The so-called “contracts,” including a great variety of deeds, conveyances, bonds, receipts, accounts and, most important of all, the actual legal decisions given by the judges in the law courts, exist in thousands.
Historical inscriptions, royal charters and re-scripts, dispatches, private letters and the general literature afford welcome supplementary information.
Even grammatical and lexicographical works, intended solely to facilitate the study of ancient literature, contain many extracts or short sentences bearing on law and custom.
The so-called “Sumerian Family Laws” are thus preserved.
The discovery of the now celebrated Code of Hammurabi (hereinafter simply termed the Code) has, however, made a more systematic study possible than could have resulted from the classification and interpretation of the other material.
Some fragments of a later code exist and have been published; but there still remain many points upon which we have no evidence.
This material dates from the earliest times down to the commencement of our era. The evidence upon a particular point may be very full at one period and almost entirely lacking at another.
The Code forms the backbone of the skeleton sketch which is here reconstructed. The fragments of it which have been recovered from Assur-bani-pal’s library at Nineveh and later Babylonian copies show that it was studied, divided into chapters entitled Ninu ilu sirum from its opening words, and recopied for fifteen hundred years or more.
The greater part of It remained in force, even through the Persian, Greek and Parthian conquests, which affected private life in Babylonia very little, and it survived to influence Syro-Roman and later Mahommedan law in Mesopotamia.
The law and custom which preceded the Code we shall call “early,” that of the New Babylonian empire (as well as the Persian, Greek, &c.) “late.” The law in Assyria was derived from Babylonia but conserved early features long after they had disappeared elsewhere.
When the Semitic tribes settled in the cities of Babylonia, their tribal custom passed over into city law.
The early history of the country is the story of a struggle for supremacy between the cities. A metropolis demanded tribute and military support from its subject cities but left their local cults and customs unaffected.
The city rights and usages were respected by kings and conquerors alike.
As late as the accession of Assur-bani-pal and Samas-sum-yukin we find the Babylonians appealing to their city laws that groups of aliens to the number of twenty at a time were free to enter the city, that foreign women once married to Babylonian husbands could not be enslaved and that not even a dog that entered the city could be put to death untried.
The population of Babylonia was of many races from early times and intercommunication between the cities was incessant. Every city had a large number of resident aliens. This freedom of intercourse must have tended to assimilate custom.
It was, however, reserved for the genius of Hammurabi to make Babylon his metropolis and weld together his vast empire by a uniform system of law.
Almost all trace of tribal custom has already disappeared from the law of the Code.
It is state-law; – alike self-help, blood-feud, marriage by capture, are absent; though family solidarity, district responsibility, ordeal, the lex talionis, are primitive features that remain.
The king is a benevolent autocrat, easily accessible to all his subjects, both able and willing to protect the weak against the highest-placed oppressor. The royal power, however, can only pardon when private resentment is appeased.
The judges are strictly supervised and appeal is allowed. The whole land is covered with feudal holdings, masters of the levy, police, &c. There is a regular postal system. The pax Babylonica is so assured that private individuals do not hesitate to ride in their carriage from Babylon to the coast of the Mediterranean. The position of women is free and dignified.
The Code did not merely embody contemporary custom or conserve ancient law. It is true that centuries of law-abiding and litigious habitue had accumulated in the temple archives of each city vast stores of precedent in ancient deeds and the records of judicial decisions, and that intercourse had assimilated city custom.
The universal habit of writing and perpetual recourse to written contract even more modified primitive custom and ancient precedent. Provided the parties could agree, the Code left them free to contract as a rule.
Their deed of agreement was drawn up in the temple by a notary public, and confirmed by an oath “by god and the king.” It was publicly sealed and witnessed by professional witnesses, as well as by collaterally interested parties.
The manner in which it was thus executed may have been sufficient security that its stipulations were not impious or illegal. Custom or public opinion doubtless secured that the parties would not agree to wrong.
In case of dispute the judges dealt first with the contract. They might not sustain it, but if the parties did not dispute it, they were free to observe it.
The judges’ decision might, however, be appealed against.
Many contracts contain the proviso that in case of future dispute the parties would abide by “the decision of the king.” The Code made known, in a vast number of cases, what that decision would be, and many cases of appeal to the king were sent back to the judges with orders to decide in accordance with it.
The Code itself was carefully and logically arranged and the order of its sections was conditioned by their subject-matter. Nevertheless the order is not that of modern scientific treatises, and a somewhat different order from both is most convenient for our purpose.
The Code contemplates the whole population as falling into three classes, the amelu, the muskinu and the ardu. The amelu was a patrician, the man of family, whose birth, marriage and death were registered, of ancestral estates and full civil rights.
He had aristocratic privileges and responsibilities, the right to exact retaliation for corporal injuries, and liability to heavier punishment for crimes and misdemeanors, higher fees and fines to pay. To this class belonged the king and court, the higher officials, the professions and craftsmen.
The term became in time a mere courtesy title but originally carried with it standing. Already in the Code, when status is not concerned, it is used to denote “any one.”
There was no property qualification nor does the term appear to be racial. It is most difficult to characterize the muskinu exactly. The term came in time to mean “a beggar” and with that meaning has passed through Aramaic and Hebrew into many modern languages; but though the Code does not regard him as necessarily poor, he may have been landless. He was free, but had to accept monetary compensation for corporal injuries, paid smaller fees and fines, even paid less offerings to the gods.
He inhabited a separate quarter of the city. There is no reason to regard him as specially connected with the court, as a royal pensioner, nor as forming the bulk of the population. The rarity of any reference to him in contemporary documents makes further specification conjectural.
The ardu was a slave, his master’s chattel, and formed a very numerous class. He could acquire property and even hold other slaves.
His master clothed and fed him, paid his doctor’s fees, but took all compensation paid for injury done to him.
His master usually found him a slave-girl as wife (the children were then born slaves), often set him up in a house (with farm or business) and simply took an annual rent of him.
Otherwise he might marry a free-woman (the children were then free), who might bring him a dower which his master could not touch, and at his death one-half of his property passed to his master as his heir.
He could acquire his freedom by purchase from his master, or might be freed and dedicated to a temple, or even adopted, when he became an amelu and not a muskinu. Slaves were recruited by purchase abroad, from captives taken in war and by freemen degraded for debt or crime.
A slave often ran away; if caught, the captor was bound to restore him to his master, and the Code fixes a reward of two shekels which the owner must pay the captor.
It was about one-tenth of the average value. To detain, harbour, &c., a slave was punished by death. So was an attempt to get him to leave the city.
A slave bore an identification mark, which could only be removed by a surgical operation and which later consisted of his owner’s name tattooed or branded on the arm.
On the great estates in Assyria and its subject provinces were many serfs, mostly of subject race, settled captives, or quondam slaves, tied to the soil they cultivated and sold with the estate but capable of possessing land and property of their own. There is little trace of serfs in Babylonia, unless the muskinu be really a serf.
The god of a city was originally owner of its land, which encircled it with an inner ring of irrigable arable land and an outer fringe of pasture, and the citizens were his tenants.
The god and his vicegerent, the king, had long ceased to disturb tenancy, and were content with fixed dues in naturalia, stock, money or service.
One of the earliest monuments records the purchase by a king of a large estate for his son, paying a fair market price and adding a handsome honorarium to the many owners in costly garments, plate, and precious articles of furniture.
The Code recognizes complete private ownership in land, but apparently extends the right to hold land to votaries, merchants (and resident aliens?).
But all land was sold subject to its fixed charges. The king, however, could free land from these charges by charter, which was a frequent way of rewarding those who deserved well of the state.
It is from these charters that we learn nearly all we know of the obligations that lay upon land. The state demanded men for the army and the corvee as well as dues in kind.
A definite area was bound to find a bowman together with his linked pikeman (who bore the shield for both) and to furnish them with supplies for the campaign. This area was termed “a bow” as early as the 8th century B.C., but the usage was much earlier.
Later, a horseman was due from certain areas. A man was only bound to serve so many (six?) times, but the land had to find a man annually.
The service was usually discharged by slaves and serfs, but the amelu (and perhaps the muskenu) went to war. The “bows” were grouped in tens and hundreds. The corvee was less regular.
The letters of Hammurabi often deal with claims to exemption.
Religious officials and shepherds in charge of flocks were exempt. Special liabilities lay upon riparian owners to repair canals, bridges, quays, etc.
The state claimed certain proportions of all crops, stock, &c. The king’s messengers could commandeer any subject’s property, giving a receipt. Further, every city had its own actuarial duties, customs, ferry dues, highway and water rates.
The king had long ceased to be, if he ever was, owner of the land. He had his own royal estates, his private property and dues from all his subjects.
The higher officials had endowments and official residences. The Code regulates the feudal position of certain classes.
They held an estate from the king consisting of house, garden, field, stock and a salary, on condition of personal service on the king’s errand.
They could not delegate the service on pain of death. When ordered abroad they could nominate a son, if capable, to hold the benefice and carry on the duty. If there was no son capable, the state put in a locum tenets, but granted one-third to the wife to maintain herself and children.
The benefice was inalienable, could not be sold, pledged, exchanged, sublet, devised or diminished. Other land was held of the state for rent.
Ancestral estate was strictly tied to the family. If a holder would sell, the family had the right of redemption and there seems to have been no time-limit to its exercise.
The temple occupied a most important position. It received from its estates, from tithes and other fixed dues, as well as from the sacrifices (a customary share) and other offerings of the faithful, vast amounts of all sorts of naturalia; besides money and permanent gifts.
The larger temples had many officials and servants. Originally, perhaps, each town clustered round one temple, and each head of a family had a right to minister there and share its receipts.
As the city grew, the right to so many days a year at one or other shrine (or its “gate”) descended in certain families and became a species of property which could be pledged, rented or shared within the family, but not alienated.
In spite of all these demands, however, the temples became great granaries and store-houses; as they also were the city archives.
The temple held its responsibilities. If a citizen was captured by the enemy and could not ransom himself the temple of his city must do so.
To the temple came the poor farmer to borrow seed corn or supplies for harvesters, &c.–advances which he repaid without interest. The king’s power over the temple was not proprietary but administrative.
He might borrow from it but repaid like other borrowers. The tithe seems to have been the composition for the rent due to the god for his land. It is not clear that all lands paid tithe, perhaps only such as once had a special connection with the temple.
The Code deals with a class of persons devoted to the service of a god, as vestals or hierodules. The vestals were vowed to chastity, lived together in a great nunnery, were forbidden to open or enter a tavern, and together with other votaries had many privileges.
The Code recognizes many ways of disposing of property–sale, lease, barter, gift, dedication, deposit, loan, pledge, all of which were matters of contract.
Sale was the delivery of the purchase (in the case of real estate symbolized by a staff, a key, or deed of conveyance) in return for the purchase money, receipts being given for both.
Credit, if given, was treated as a debt, and secured as a loan by the seller to be repaid by the buyer, fr which he gave a bond. The Code admits no claim unsubstantiated by documents or the oath of witnesses.
A buyer had to convince himself of the seller’s title. If he bought (or received on deposit) from a minor or a slave without power of attorney, he would be executed as a thief. If the goods were stolen and the rightful owner reclaimed them, he had to prove his purchase by producing the seller and the deed of sale or witnesses to it.
Otherwise he would be adjudged a thief and die. If he proved his purchase, he had to give up the property but had his remedy against the seller or, if he had died, could reclaim five-fold from his estate.
A man who bought a slave abroad, might find that he had been stolen or captured from Babylonia, and he had to restore him to his former owner without profit.
If he bought property belonging to a feudal holding, or to a ward in chancery, he had to return it and forfeit what he gave for it as well.
He could repudiate the purchase of a slave attacked by the bennu sickness within the month (later, a hundred days), and had a female slave three days on approval. A defect of title or undisclosed liability would invalidate the sale at any time.
Landowners frequently cultivated their land themselves but might employ a husbandman or let it. The husbandman was bound to carry out the proper cultivation, raise an average crop and leave the field in good tilt h.
In case the crop failed the Code fixed a statutory return. Land might be let at a fixed rent when the Code enacted that accidental loss fell on the tenant.
If let on share-profit, the landlord and tenant shared the loss proportionately to their stipulated share of profit.
If the tenant paid his rent and left the land in good tilth, the landlord could not interfere nor forbid subletting. Waste land was let to reclaim, the tenant being rent-free for three years and paying a stipulated rent in the fourth year.
If the tenant neglected to reclaim the land the Code enacted that he must hand it over in good tilth and fixed a statutory rent. Gardens or plantations were let in the same ways and under the same conditions; but for date-groves four years’ free tenure was allowed.
The meta yer system was in vogue, especially on temple lands. The landlord found land, labor, oxen for furloughing and working the watering-machines, carting, threshing or other implements, seed corn, rations for the workmen and fodder for the cattle.
The tenant, or steward, usually had other land of his own. If he stole the seed, rations or fodder, the Code enacted that his fingers should be cut off.
If he appropriated or sold the implements, impoverished or sublet the cattle, he was heavily fined and in default of payment might be condemned to be torn to pieces by the cattle on the field. Rent was as contracted.
Irrigation was indispensable. If the irrigation master neglected to repair his dyke, or left his runnel open and caused a flood, he had to make good the damage done to his neighbors’ crops, or be sold with his family to pay the cost.
The theft of a watering-machine, water-bucket or other agricultural implement was heavily fined.
Houses were let usually for the year, but also for longer terms, rent being paid in advance, half-yearly.
The contract generally specified that the house was in good repair, and the tenant was bound to keep it so. The woodwork, including doors and door frames, was removable, and the tenant might bring and take away his own.
The Code enacted that if the landlord would re-enter before the term was up, he must remit a fair proportion of the rent. Land was leased for houses or other buildings to be built upon it, the tenant being rent-free for eight or ten years; after which the building came into the landlord’s possession.
Despite the multitude of slaves, hired labor was often needed, especially at harvest.
This was matter of contract, and the hirer, who usually paid in advance, might demand a guarantee to fulfill the engagement. Cattle were hired for ploughing, working the watering-machines, carting, threshing, etc.
The Code fixed a statutory wage for sowers, ox-drivers, field-laborers, and hire for oxen, asses, &c.
There were many herds and flocks. The flocks were committed to a shepherd who gave receipt for them and took them out to pasture.
The Code fixed him a wage. He was responsible for all care, must restore ox for ox, sheep for sheep, must breed them satisfactorily.
Any dishonest use of the flock had to be repaid ten-fold, but loss by disease or wild beasts fell on the owner. The shepherd made good all loss due to his neglect.
If he let the flock feed on a field of corn he had to pay damages four-fold; if he turned them into standing corn when they ought to have been folded he paid twelve-fold.
In commercial matters, payment in kind was still common, though the contracts usually stipulate for cash, naming the standard expected, that of Babylon, Larsa, Assyria, Carchemish, etc.
The Code enacted, however, that a debtor must be allowed to pay in produce according to statutory scale. If a debtor had neither money nor crop, the creditor-must not refuse goods.
Debt was secured on the person of the debtor. Distrait on a debtor’s corn was forbidden by the Code; not only must the creditor give it back, but his illegal action forfeited his claim altogether.
An unwarranted seizure for debt was fined, as was the distrait of a working ox. The debtor being seized for debt could nominate as emancipate or hostage to work off the debt, his wife, a child, or slave.
The creditor could only hold a wife or child three years as mancipium. If the mancipium died a natural death while in the creditor’s possession no claim could lie against the latter; but if he was the cause of death by cruelty, he had to give son for son, or pay for a slave.
He could sell a slave-hostage, unless she were a slave-girl who had borne her master children. She had to be redeemed by her owner.
The debtor could also pledge his property, and in contracts often pledged a field house or crop. The Code enacted, however, that the debtor should always take the crop himself and pay the creditor from it.
If the crop failed, payment was deferred and no interest could be charged for that year. If the debtor did not cultivate the field himself he had to pay for the cultivation, but if the cultivation was already finished he must harvest it himself and pay his debt from the crop.
If the cultivator did not get a crop this would not cancel his contract. Pledges were often made where the intrinsic value of the article was equivalent to the amount of the debt; but antichretic pledge was more common, where the profit of the pledge was a set-off against the interest of the debt.
The whole property of the debtor might be pledged as security for the payment of the debt, without any of it coming into the enjoyment of the creditor. Personal guarantees were often given that the debtor would repay or the guarantor become liable himself.
Trade was very extensive.
Trade was common place amongst the entire lands of Mesopotamia and beyond.
A common way of doing business was for a merchant to entrust goods or money to a traveling agent, who sought a market for his goods. The caravans traveled far beyond the limits of the empire.
The Code insisted that the agent should inventory and give a receipt for all that he received. No claim could be made for anything not so entered.
Even if the agent made no profit he was bound to return double what he had received, if he made poor profit he had to make up the deficiency; but he was not responsible for loss by robbery or extortion on his travels.
On his return, the principal must give a receipt for what was handed over to him. Any false entry or claim on the agent’s part was penalized three-fold, on the principal’s part six-fold.
In normal cases profits were divided according to contract, usually equally.
A considerable amount of forwarding was done by the caravans.
The carrier gave a receipt for the consignment, took all responsibility and exacted a receipt on delivery. If he defaulted he paid five-fold. He was usually paid in advance. Deposit, especially warehousing of grain, was charged for at one-sixtieth.
The warehouseman took all risks, paid double for all shortage, but no claim could be made unless be had given a properly witnessed receipt. Water traffic on the Euphrates and canals was early very considerable.
Ships, whose tonnage was estimated at the amount of grain they could carry, were continually hired for the a transport of all kinds of goods. The Code fixes the price for building and insists on the builder’s giving a year’s guarantee of seaworthiness. It fixes the hire of ship and of crew.
The captain was responsible for the freight and the ship; he had to replace all loss.
Even if he re floated the ship he had to pay a fine of half its value for sinking it. In the case of collision the boat under way was responsible for damages to the boat at anchor.
The Code also regulated the liquor traffic, fixing a fair price for beer and forbidding the connivance of the tavern-keeper (a female!) at disorderly conduct or treasonable assembly, under pain of death.
She was to hale the offenders to the palace, which implied an efficient and accessible police system.
Payment through a banker or by written draft against deposit was frequent.
Bonds to pay were treated as negotiable. Interest a was rarely charged on advances by the temple or wealthy land-owners for pressing needs, but this may have been part of the metayer system.
The borrowers may have been tenants. Interest was charged at very high rates for overdue loans of this kind. Merchants (and even temples in some cases) made ordinary business loans, charging from 20 to 30%.
Marriage retained the form of purchase, but was essentially a contract to be man and wife together. The marriage of young people was usually arranged between the relatives, the bride- groom’s father providing the bride-price, which with other presents the suitor ceremonially presented to the bride’s father.
This bride-price was usually handed over by her father to the bride on her marriage, and so came back into the bridegroom’s possession, along with her dowry, which was her portion as a daughter.
The bride-price varied much, according to the position of the parties, but was in excess of that paid for a slave.
The Code enacted that if the father does not, after accepting a man’s presents, give him his daughter, he, must return the presents doubled.
Even if his decision was brought about by libel on the part of the suitor’s friend this was done, and the Code enacted that the faithless friend should not marry the girl.
If a suitor changed his mind, he forfeited the presents. The dowry might include real estate, but generally consisted of personal effects and household furniture. It remained the wife’s for life, descending to her children, if any; otherwise returning to her family, when the husband could deduct the bride-price if it had not been given to her, or return it, if it had.
The marriage ceremony included joining of hands and the utterance of some formula of acceptance on the part of the bridegroom, as “I am the son of nobles, silver and gold shall fill thy lap, thou shalt be my wife, I will be thy husband. Like the fruit of a garden I will give thee offspring.” It must be performed by a freeman.
The marriage contract, without which the Code ruled that the woman was no wife, usually stated the consequences to which each party was liable for repudiating the other. These by no means necessarily agree with the Code. Many conditions might be inserted: as that the wife should act as maidservant to her mother-in-law, or to a first wife. The married couple formed a unit as to external responsibility, especially for debt.
The man was responsible for debts contracted by his wife, even before her marriage, as well as for his own; but he could use her as a mancipium.
Hence the Code allowed a proviso to be inserted in the marriage contract, that the wife should not be seized for her husband’s prenuptial debts; but enacted that then he was not responsible for her prenuptial debts, and, in any case, that both together were responsible for all debts contracted after marriage.
A man might make his wife a settlement by deed of gift, which gave her a life interest in part of his property, and he might reserve to her the right to bequeath it to a favorite child, but she could in no case leave it to her family
. Although married she always remained a member of her father’s house–she is rarely named wife of A, usually daughter of B, or mother of C.
Divorce was optional with the man, but he had to restore the dowry and, if the wife had borne him children, she had the custody of them.
He had then to assign her the income of field, or garden, as well as goods, to maintain herself and children until they grew up. She then shared equally with them in the allowance (and apparently in his estate at his death) and was free to marry again.
If she had no children, he returned her the dowry and paid her a sum equivalent to the bride-price, or a mina of silver, if there had been none. The latter is the forfeit usually named in the contract for his repudiation of her.
If she had been a bad wife, the Code allowed him to send her away, while he kept the children and her dowry; or he could degrade her to the position of a slave in his own house, where she would have food and clothing.
She might bring an action against him for cruelty and neglect and, if she proved her case, obtain a judicial separation, taking with her her dowry.
No other punishment fell on the man. If she did not prove her case, but proved to be a bad wife, she was drowned. If she were left without maintenance during her husband’s involuntary absence, she could cohabit with another man, but must return to her husband if he came back, the children of the second union remaining with their own father.
If she had maintenance, a breach of the marriage tie was adultery. Wilful desertion by, or exile of, the husband dissolved the marriage, and if he came back he had no claim on her property; possibly not on his own.
As a widow, the wife took her husband’s place in the family, living on in his house and bringing up the children. She could only remarry with judicial consent, when the judge was bound to inventory the deceased’s estate and hand it over to her and her new husband in trust for the children.
They could not alienate a single utensil. If she did not remarry, she lived on in her husband’s house and took a child’s share on the division of his estate, when the children had grown up.
She still retained her dowry and any settlement deeded to her by her husband. This property came to her children. If she had remarried, all her children shared equally in her dowry, but the first husband’s gift fell to his children or to her selection among them, if so empowered.
Monogamy was the rule, and a childless wife might give her husband a maid (who was no wife) to bear him children, who were reckoned hers.
She remained mistress of her maid and might degrade her to slavery again for insolence, but could not sell her if she had borne her husband children. If the wife did this, the Code did not allow the husband to take a concubine.
If she would not, he could do so. The concubine was a wife, though not of the same rank; the first wife had no power over her.
A concubine was a free woman, was often dowered for marriage and her children were legitimate.
She could only be divorced on the same conditions as a wife. If a wife became a chronic invalid, the husband was bound to maintain her in the home they bad made together, unless she preferred to take her dowry and go back to her father’s house; but he was free to remarry. In all these cases the children were legitimate and legal heirs.
There was, of course, no hindrance to a man having children by a slave girl. These children were free, in any case, and their mother could not be sold, though she might be pledged, and she was free on her master’s death.
These children could be legitimized by their father’s acknowledgment before witnesses, and were often adopted. They then ranked equally in sharing their father’s estate, but if not adopted, the wife’s children divided and took first choice.
Vestal virgins were not supposed to have children, yet they could and often did marry. The Code contemplated that such a wife would give a husband a maid as above. Free women might marry slaves and be dowered for the marriage.
The children were free, and at the slave’s death the wife took her dowry and half what she and her husband had acquired in wedlock for self and children; the master taking the other half as his slave’s heir.
A father had control over his children till their marriage. He had a right to their labour in return for their keep. He might hire them out and receive their wages, pledge them for debt, even sell them outright. Mothers had the same rights in the absence of the father; even elder brothers when both parents were dead. A father had no claim on his married children for support, but they retained a right to inherit on his death.
The daughter was not only in her father’s power to be given in marriage, but he might dedicate her to the service of some god as a vestal or a hierodule; or give her as a concubine.
She had no choice in these matters, which were often decided in her childhood. A grown-up daughter might wish to become a votary, perhaps in preference to an uncongenial marriage, and it seems that her father could not refuse her wish.
In all these cases the father might dower her. If he did not, on his death the brothers were bound to do so, giving her a full child’s share if a wife, a concubine or a vestal, but one-third of a child’s share if she were a hierodule or a Marduk priestess.
The latter had the privilege of exemption from state dues and absolute disposal of her property. All other daughters had only a life interest in their dowry, which reverted to their family, if childless, or went to their children if they had any.
A father might, however, execute a deed granting a daughter power to leave her property to a favorite brother or sister. A daughter’s estate was usually managed for her by her brothers, but if they did not satisfy her, she could appoint a steward. If she married, her husband managed it.
The son also appears to have received his share on marriage, but did not always then leave his father’s house; he might bring his wife there. This was usual in child marriages.
Adoption was very common, especially where the father (or mother) was childless or had seen all his children grow up and marry away.
The child was then adopted to care for the parents’ old age. This was done by contract, which usually specified what the parent had to leave and what maintenance was expected.
The real children, if any, were usually consenting parties to an arrangement which cut off their expectations. They even, in some cases, found the estate for the adopted child who was to relieve them of a care.
If the adopted child failed to carry out the filial duty the contract was annulled in the law courts. Slaves were often adopted and if they proved unfiltered were reduced to slavery again.
A craftsman often adopted a son to learn the craft. He profited by the son’s labor.
If he failed to teach his son the craft, that son could prosecute him and get the contract annulled. This was a form of apprenticeship, and it is not clear that the apprentice had any filial relation.
A man who adopted a son, and afterward married and had a family of his own, could dissolve the contract but must give the adopted child one-third of a child’s share in goods, but no real estate.
That could only descend in the family to which he had ceased to belong. Vestals frequently adopted daughters, usually other vestals, to care for their old age.
Adoption had to be with consent of the real parents, who usually executed a deed making over the child, who thus ceased to have any claim upon them. But vestals, hierodules, certain palace officials and slaves had no rights over their children and could raise no obstacle.
Foundlings and illegitimate children had no parents to object. If the adopted child discovered his true parents and wanted to return to them, his eye or tongue was torn out. An adopted child was a full heir, the contract might even assign him the position of eldest son. Usually he was residuary legatee.
All legitimate children shared equally in the father’s estate at his death, reservation being made of a bride-price for an unmarried son, dower for a daughter or property deeded to favorite children by the father.
There was no birthright attaching to the position of eldest son, but he usually acted as executor and after considering what each had already received equalized the shares. He even made grants in excess to the others from his own share.
When there were two mothers, the two families shared equally in the father’s estate until later times when the first family took two-thirds. Daughters, in the absence of sons, had sons’ rights. Children also shared their own mother’s property, but had no share in that of a stepmother.
A father could disinherit a son in early times without restriction, but the Code insisted upon judicial consent and that only for repeated unfamiliar conduct. In early times the son who denied his father had his front hair shorn, a slave-mark put on him, and could be sold as a slave; while if he denied his mother he had his front hair shorn, was driven round the city as an example and expelled his home, but not degraded to slavery.
Adultery was punished with the death of both parties by drowning, but if the husband was willing to pardon his wife, the king might intervene to pardon the paramour.
For incest with his own mother, both were burned to death; with a stepmother, the man was disinherited; with a daughter, the man was exiled; with a daughter-in-law, he was drowned; with a son’s betrothed, he was fined.
A wife who for her lover’s sake procured her husband’s death was gibbeted. A betrothed girl, seduced by her prospective father-in-law, took her dowry and returned to her family, and was free to marry as she chose.
In the criminal law the ruling principle was the lex talionis.
Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, limb for limb was the penalty for assault upon an amelu. A sort of symbolic retaliation was the punishment of the offending member, seen in the cutting off the hand that struck a father or stole a trust; in cutting off the breast of a wet-nurse who substituted a changeling for the child entrusted to her; in the loss of the tongue that denied father or mother (in the Elamite contracts the same penalty was inflicted for perjury); in the loss of the eye that pried into forbidden secrets.
The loss of the surgeon’s hand that caused loss of life or limb or the brander’s hand that obliterated a slave’s identification mark, are very similar. The slave, who struck a freeman or denied his master, lost an ear, the organ of hearing and symbol of obedience.
To bring another into danger of death by false accusation was punished by death. To cause loss of liberty or property by false witness was punished by the penalty the perjurer sought to bring upon another.
The death penalty was freely awarded for theft and other crimes regarded as coming under that head, for theft involving entrance of palace or temple treasury, for illegal purchase from minor or slave, for selling stolen goods or receiving the same, for common theft in the open (in default of multiple restoration) or receiving the same, for false claim to goods, for kidnapping, for assisting or harboring fugitive slaves, for detaining or appropriating same, for brigandage, for fraudulent sale of drink, for disorderly conduct of tavern, for delegation of personal service, for misappropriating the levy, for oppression of feudal holders, for causing death of a householder by bad building.
The manner of death is not specified in these cases. This death penalty was also fixed for such conduct as placed another in danger of death.
A specified form of death penalty occurs in the following cases:-gibbeting (on the spot where crime was committed) for burglary, later also for encroaching on the king’s highway, for getting a slave-brand obliterated, for procuring husband’s death; burning for incest with own mother, for vestal entering or opening tavern, for theft at fire (on the spot); drowning for adultery, rape of betrothed maiden, bigamy, bad conduct as wife, seduction of daughter-in-law.
A curious extension of the talio is the death of creditor’s son for his father’s having caused the death of debtor’s son as mancipium; of builder’s son for his father’s causing the death of house-owner’s son by building the house badly; the death of a man’s daughter because her father caused the death of another man’s daughter.
The contracts naturally do not concern such criminal cases as the above, as a rule, but marriage contracts do specify death by strangling, drowning, precipitation from a tower or pinnacle of the temple or by the iron sword for a wife’s repudiation of her husband. We are quite without evidence as to the executive in all these cases.
Exile was inflicted for incest with a daughter; disinheritance for incest with a stepmother or for repeated unfilial conduct. Sixty strokes of an ox-hide scourge were awarded for a brutal assault on a superior, both being amelu. Branding (perhaps the equivalent of degradation to slavery) was the penalty for slander of a married woman or vestal. Deprivation of office in perpetuity fell upon the corrupt judge. Enslavement befell the extravagant wife and unfilled children. Imprisonment was common, but is not recognized by the Code.
The commonest of all penalties was a fine. This is awarded by the Code for corporal injuries to a muskinu or slave (paid to his master); for damages done to property, for breach of contract.
The restoration of goods appropriated, illegally bought or damaged by neglect, was usually accompanied by a fine, giving it the form of multiple restoration. This might be double, treble, fourfold, fivefold, sixfold, tenfold, twelve fold, even thirty fold, according to the enormity of the offense.
The Code recognized the importance of intention. A man who killed another in a quarrel must swear he did not do so intentionally, and was then only fined according to the rank of the deceased.
The Code does not say what would be the penalty of murder, but death is so often awarded where death is caused that we can hardly doubt that the murderer was put to death.
If the assault only led to injury and was unintentional, the assailant in a quarrel had to pay the doctor’s fees. A brander, induced to remove a slave’s identification mark, could swear to his ignorance and was free.
The owner of an ox which gored a man on the street was only responsible for damages if, the ox was known by him to be vicious, even if it caused death. If the mancipium died a natural death under the creditor’s hand, the creditor was “Scott” free. In ordinary cases responsibility was not demanded for accident or for more than proper care. Poverty excused bigamy on the part of a deserted wife.
On the other hand carelessness and neglect were severely punished, as in the case of the unskilful physician, if it led to loss of life or limb his hands were cut off, a slave had to be replaced, the loss of his eye paid for to half his value; a veterinary surgeon who caused the death of an ox or ass paid quarter value; a builder, whose careless workmanship caused death, lost his life or paid for it by the death of his child, replaced slave or goods, and in any case had to rebuild the house or make good any damages due to defective building and repair the defect as well. The boat-builder had to make good any defect of construction or damage due to it for a year’s warranty.
Throughout the Code respect is paid to status.
Suspicion was not enough. The criminal must be taken in the act, e.g. the adulterer, ravisher, &c. A man could not be convicted of theft unless the goods were found in his possession.
In the case of a lawsuit the plaintiff preferred his own plea.
There is no trace of professional advocates, but the plea had to be in writing and the notary doubtless assisted in the drafting of it.
The judge saw the plea, called the other parties before him and sent for the witnesses. If these were not at hand he might adjourn the case for their production, specifying a time up to six months. Guarantees might be entered into to produce the witnesses on a fixed day.
The more important cases, especially those involving life and death, were tried by a bench of judges. With the judges were associated a body of elders, who shared in the decision, but whose exact function is not yet clear. Agreements, declarations and non-contentious cases are usually witnessed by one judge and twelve elders.
Parties and witnesses were put on oath. The penalty for the false witness was usually that which would have been awarded the convicted criminal. In matters beyond the knowledge of men, as the guilt or innocence of an alleged wizard or a suspected wife, the ordeal by water was used.
The accused jumped into the sacred river, and the innocent swam while the guilty drowned.
The accused could clear himself by oath where his own knowledge was alone available. The plaintiff could swear to his loss by brigands, as to goods claimed, the price paid for a slave purchased abroad or the sum due to him.
But great stress was laid on the production of written evidence. It was a serious thing to lose a document. The judges might be satisfied of its existence and terms by the evidence of the witnesses to it, and then issue an order that whenever found it should be given up. Contracts annulled were ordered to be broken. The court might go a journey to view the property and even take with them the sacred symbols on which oath was made.
The decision given was embodied in writing, sealed and witnessed by the judges, the elders, witnesses and a scribe. Women might act in all these capacities. The parties swore an oath, embodied in the document, to observe its stipulations. Each took a copy and one was held by the scribe to be stored in the archives.
Appeal to the king was allowed and is well attested. The judges at Babylon seem to have formed a superior court to those of provincial towns, but a defendant might elect to answer the charge before the local court and refuse to plead at Babylon.
Finally, it may be noted that many immoral acts, such as the use of false weights, lying, &c., which could not be brought into court, are severely denounced in the Omen Tablets as likely to bring the offender into “the hand of God” as opposed to “the hand of the king.”
The Sumerian’s and Mesopotamian Cultures had allot of laws that were formulated into today’s systematic political enviroment.

Hail Satan
Grand Magister Blackwood

Commentary from Grand Magister Blackwood
Counting Satanic Sheep and Muslim Sheep!

I have done my research and before I react like some “progressive liberal” or “pseudo intellectual”(both types of people I personally hate) I will unveil a few things quoted not from me but from their scriptures, so that way those who are sheep won’t try to twist my words like they always do.
I am a fundamental type person I research often for days on the commentary I provide the off-line members and as many of you have already seen the on-line members, we are making changes as I am making changes I am no longer involved in on-line other than to post my informative expose’s on the sheep and those who we as Theistic Satanist’s can easily drive over.

See people are foolishly finding themselves moving towards the trap known as Islam, and even in Satanism the weak minded or somewhat less studied person will often move to spread Religious Tolerance this can never happen as we cannot accept those we can easily slay in the fields.

People have moved towards You Tube © yet I have enjoyed a spike in web traffic to my blogs almost 1000 additional readers in one month, but there is much to explain I will debut You Tube soon and other venues to explain why I am on the Anti-Islam “band wagon.”
But enough of the updates and news on to the “meat and potatoes” of this posting.

This is directly from the Quran:

al Qur’an, Surat At-Tawbah(The Repentance) 9:123
Sahih International
O you who have believed, fight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness. And know that Allah is with the righteous.
Tafsir al-Jalalayn
O you who believe, fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, that is, the nearest, followed by the next nearest of them, and let them find harshness in you, that is, severity, in other words, be harsh with them, and know that God is with the pious, helping and granting [them] victory.

As you can see, it says, very clearly, that every Muslim should fight with the neighbor who is a disbeliever and then the next till there no more non-Muslims left in the World.

Again, notice what the Qur’an says about the Muslim who will not fight:

al Qur’an, Surat At-Tawbah(The Repentance) 9:39
Sahih International
If you do not go forth, He will punish you with a painful punishment and will replace you with another people, and you will not harm Him at all. And Allah is over all things competent.
Tafsir al-Jalalayn
If (illa: la has been assimilated with the noun of the conditional particle in, in both instances [here and in the next verse]) you do not go forth, [if you do not] set out with the Prophet(s) for the struggle, He will chastise you with a painful chastisement, and He will substitute [you with] another other than you, that is, He will bring them in your place, and you will not hurt Him, that is, God, or [‘him’ as being] the Prophet(s), at all, should you neglect to help him [to victory], for God [Himself] will indeed bring victory to His religion; for God has power over all things, including bringing victory to His religion and His Prophet.

That if the Muslim is reluctant to fight, then Islam must replace him and let him suffer the punishment of the infidel.

And, again, it clearly says that they Muslims may not ally nor befriend the disbelievers.

al Qur’an, Surat Ali Imran(Family of Imran) 3:28
Sahih International
Let not believers take disbelievers as allies rather than believers. And whoever [of you] does that has nothing with Allah , except when taking precaution against them in prudence. And Allah warns you of Himself, and to Allah is the [final] destination.
Tafsir al-Jalalayn
Let not the believers take the disbelievers as patrons, rather than, that is, instead of, the believers — for whoever does that, that is, [whoever] takes them as patrons, does not belong to, the religion of, God in anyway — unless you protect yourselves against them, as a safeguard (tuqatan, ‘as a safeguard’, is the verbal noun from taqiyyatan), that is to say, [unless] you fear something, in which case you may show patronage to them through words, but not in your hearts: this was before the hegemony of Islam and [the dispensation] applies to any individual residing in a land with no say in it. God warns you, He instills fear in you, of His Self, [warning] that He may be wrathful with you if you take them as patrons; and to God is the journey’s end, the return, and He will requite you.

This is why we find the founder of the Order of Nine Angles can never return despite the rumors innuendos and diatribe they seemingly blog about on a regular basis.
So as people fail to see Islam neither loves Satanist’s or anyone else, we do not need this 4th Century B.C. Like phoney religion to spread here at all, or I guess we will really have to start some bloodshed.

Recently the Temples of Satan located Abdul near his flat and he was assaulted by operatives of the Temples of Satan his group thwarted our operatives and Abdul escaped with only a “black eye” who knows what could happen?

Thanks to those Patriotic Brit’s who found out the letters address was false, yet the letter left some great hints to finding him as a friend near Liverpool, more later of course.

Soon is all I can say! Satanism and Islam cannot mix and here to dispel the assumption is an interesting article as I said this is again not from just me:

Apostasy in Islam (Arabic: ارتداد, irtidād or ridda‎) is commonly defined as the rejection in word or deed of their former religion (apostasy) by a person who was previously a follower of Islam. The traditional schools of Islamic jurisprudence are unanimous in holding that apostasy by a male Muslim is punishable by death. They differ on whether to execute the apostate immediately or grant the apostate a temporary reprieve in order to allow him to repent and avoid the penalty. The schools also differ on whether a female apostate is to be killed, or only imprisoned until she re-embraces the faith.[1]
The four major Sunni schools of Islamic jurisprudence (Madh’hab) differentiate between harmful apostasy and harmless apostasy (also known as major and minor apostasy) in accepting repentance.[2]
According to Wael Hallaq apostasy laws are not derived from the Qur’an,[3] and Quran Alone Muslims do not support the apostasy penalty; many of them openly condemn it.
In addition to Quran Alone Muslims, some other Islamic scholars such as Gamal Al-Banna also oppose clearly any penalty for apostasy.[4] Other scholars who disagree or claimed to express disagreement include Shafi`i Grand Mufti Ali Gomaa,[5][6] Shabir Ally, and Maliki jurist Abu al-Walid al-Baji and Shi’a Grand Ayatollah Hossein-Ali Montazeri,[7] argued or issued fatwas that the changing of religion is not punishable or is only punishable under restricted circumstances.[8][9][10][11] Abu-Hanifa and his followers like the jurist Sarakhsi refused death penalty for women[12] supporting jail for them till re-embracing islam.
Zakir Naik has stated that any Muslim is free to convert out of Islam if the person so chooses, but added that if a Muslim converts then speaks against Islam then that is considered as treason. Naik stated that under Islamic law this is punishable by death.[13][14][15]
Some prominent recent examples of writers and activists killed because of apostasy claims include Mahmoud Mohammed Taha, Faraj Foda, Rashad Khalifa, Ghorban Tourani, Necati Aydin, Uğur Yüksel, and the Egyptian Noble prize winner Najib Mahfouz has been injured in an attempted assassination.
Some prominent recent examples of death sentences threatened or issued for apostasy include non-religious authors and activists such as Salman Rushdie, Taslima Nasrin, Maryam Namazie, Mina Ahadi, Arzu Toker, and the blogger Kareem Amer, as well as converts to Christianity such as the Egyptian Mohammed Hegazy and the Afghan Abdul Rahman.[16]
Many Contemporary reform Muslim intellectuals have been accused of apostasy, such as Ahmed Subhy Mansour, Edip Yuksel.
As one can see no matter how many stupid Sheep of Satanism who speak of Myatt returning can save him if he does leave his own choice will get him, and now that we located this terrorist we will offer up much more than a letter which tells tales, we now have several more interesting things to speak on in the days ahead and for those tied to the Order of Nine Angles realize your founder put up no fight against us when met face-to-face and will face more than a “old fashioned” we you know!
But for anyone to wrap their arms around Islam think of this they have the blood of our ancestors on their hands they do not accept Satanist’s nor anyone else unrelated to Islam and for those stupid enough not to read or do some research I understand your apparent lack of reading comprehension we could expect such as even our politicians feed off fake media stories and even the news media takes in and puts out false reports I understand but before you criticize me or my people understand this we don’t do sinister, or weak we are the swords that are raised for Satan and you are?
You are a group of individual’s or shall I say associates that speak for no founder organization or faith is not of your world, you are fake phonies and zealot’s that cannot even speak for the Order of Nine Angles and no matter how many stories you compose and create Myatt will not return and soon not because of Islam, other things and perhaps another terrorist falls, who knows what could happen in England.
Location CHECK!
For those in Satanism we do not need to wrap our hands or hearts around Religious Tolerance and even amongst the Sheep we count we must distance ourselves for the betterment of Satanism from groups aligned with the Order of Nine Angles, simply ask yourself who do you serve Islam or Satan?

Thanks
Grand Magister Blackwood

Satanism 8/31/2010
From Grand Magister Blackwood Leader of Theistic Satanism

Today we will examine just how many people the God of Judaism and Christianity has killed over his time, this certainly is more than Ng or Satan, I am interested in why Judaism and Christianity has any right to expect religious tolerance.
I will examine Islam as well as we find ourselves surrounded by Islam in Satanism from the Order of Nine Angles diatribe many American Satanists have adopted.

Number Killed
Cumulative Total

Lot’s wife for looking back
Gen.19:26, BT
1
1
Er who was “wicked in the sight of the Lord”
Gen.38:7, BT
1
2
Onan for spilling his seed
Gen.38:10,
BT
1
3
For dancing naked around Aaron’s golden calf
Ex.32:27-28, 35, BT
3000
3003
Aaron’s sons for offering strange fire before the Lord
Lev.10:1-3,
Num.3:4, 26:61, BT
2
3005
A blasphemer
Lev.24:10-23, BT
1
3006
A man who picked up sticks on the Sabbath
Num.15:32-36, BT
1
3007
Korah, Dathan, and Abiram (and their families)
Num.16:27, BT
12+
3019+
Burned to death for offering incense
Num.16:35,
26:10, BT
250
3269+
For complaining
Num.16:49, BT
14,700
17,969+
For “committing whoredom with the daughters of Moab”
Num.25:9, BT
24,000
41,969+
Midianite massacre (32,000 virgins were kept alive)
Num.31:1-35, BT
90,000+
131,969+
God tells Joshua to stone to death Achan (and his family) for taking the accursed thing.
Joshua 7:10-12, 24-26, BT
5+
131,974+
God tells Joshua to attack Ai and do what he did to Jericho (kill everyone).
Joshua 8:1-25, BT
12,000
143,974+
God delivered Canaanites and Perizzites
Judges 1:4, BT
10,000
153,974+
Ehud delivers a message from God: a knife into the king’s belly
Jg.3:15-22, BT
1
153,975+
God delivered Moabites
Jg.3:28-29, BT
10,000
163,975+
God forces Midianite soldiers to kill each other.
Jg.7:2-22, 8:10, BT
120,000
283,975+
The Spirit of the Lord comes on Samson
Jg.14:19, BT
30
284,005+
The Spirit of the Lord comes mightily on Samson
Jg.15:14-15, BT
1000
285,005+
Samson’s God-assisted act of terrorism
Jg.16:27-30, BT
3000
288,005+
“The Lord smote Benjamin”
Jg.20:35-37, BT
25,100
313,105+
More Benjamites
Jg.20:44-46
25,000
338,105+
For looking into the ark of the Lord
1 Sam.6:19
50,070
388,175+
God delivered Philistines
1 Sam.14:12
20
388,195+
Samuel (at God’s command) hacks Agag to death
1 Sam.15:32-33
1
388,196+
“The Lord smote Nabal.”
1 Sam.25:38
1
388,197+
Uzzah for trying to keep the ark from falling
2 Sam.6:6-7, 1 Chr.13:9-10
1
388,198+
David and Bathsheba’s baby boy
2 Sam.12:14-18
1
388,199+
Seven sons of Saul hung up before the Lord
2 Sam.21:6-9
7
388,206+
From plague as punishment for David’s census (men only; probably 200,000 if including women and children)
2 Sam.24:13, 1 Chr.21:7
70,000+
458,206+
A prophet for believing another prophet’s lie
1 Kg.13:1-24
1
458,207+
God delivers the Syrians into the Israelites’ hands
1 Kg.20:28-29
100,000
558,207+
God makes a wall fall on Syrian soldiers
1 Kg.20:30
27,000
585,207+
God sent a lion to eat a man for not killing a prophet
1 Kg.20:35-36
1
585,208+
Ahaziah is killed for talking to the wrong god.
2 Kg.1:2-4, 17, 2 Chr.22:7-9
1
585,209+
Burned to death by God
2 Kg.1:9-12
102
585,311+
God sends two bears to kill children for making fun of Elisha’s bald head
2 Kg.2:23-24
42
585,343+
Trampled to death for disbelieving Elijah
2 Kg.7:17-20
1
585,344+
Jezebel
2 Kg.9:33-37
1
585,355+
God sent lions to kill “some” foreigners
2 Kg.17:25-26
3+
585,358+
Sleeping Assyrian soldiers
2 Kg.19:35, 2 Chr.32:21, Is.37:36
185,000
770,358+
Saul
1 Chr.10:14
1
770,359+
God delivers Israel into the hands of Judah
2 Chr.13:15-17
500,000
1,270,359+
Jeroboam
2 Chr.13:20
1
1,270,360+
“The Lord smote the Ethiopians.”
2 Chr.14:9-14
1,000,000
2,270,360+
God kills Jehoram by making his bowels fall out
2 Chr.21:14-19
1
2,270,361+
Ezekiel’s wife
Ezek.24:15-18
1
2,270,362+
Ananias and Sapphira
Acts 5:1-10
2
2,270,364+
And finally Herod
Herod
Acts 12:23, BT
1
2,270,365

As one can see there can never be forgiveness for Judaism or Christianity I am not saying go out and kill Jews (however some Satanist’s have) I say do not trust the Sheep of Religion even Satanist’s will wander off in this field as well.
As Theistic Satanist’s we should never give in, give up be serious and be creative.
Hail Satanist’s
Grand Magister Blackwood

The Temples of Satan and Church of Theistic Satanism Expands Its Horizon’s.
From The Leader of Theistic Satanism Grand Magister Blackwood.

Now that we have moved along from the Terrorist David Myatt and exposed his weakness and turpitude, we move forward as Islam becomes less and less a desirable religion in America, David Myatt aligned and never leaving Islam perhaps has sunken in for the brainwashed zombies of the W.S.A. Or the Internet Order of Nine Angles both seem rather pathetic and now in the days ahead I can finally release the final blow to this group of teenage brainwashed the letter.

Its bad enough that they have decided to follow “like sheep” a set of doctrines that include Self Immolation (burning oneself up) and following text’s from a coward of a man who has turned his back on the very group he founded and silenced them from reality by stating openly that no one but him can comment for the Order of Nine Angles.

The Temples of Satan membership in Great Britain located David Myatt or Abdul Aziz as he prefers to be called and found out he resides in a flat that is reminiscent of a ghetto neighborhood in the United States, but as I knew he would.

The Temples of Satan has grown and with additions to its clergy and additions to it’s affiliates our job has just begun as we raise our swords and begin the fight for what is going to be a long one and trust me their will be blood this time and many falling to the swords of the new addition to the Temples of Satan as we welcome a more sinister order than the Order of Nine Angles a group who is underground for a reason and with this expansion we will bring back the chaos leaving the foolish brainwashed children behind in the W.S.A. Or the Hoax Order of Nine Angles.

We have not been the force in Theistic Satanism, but the Purity and Excellence that the deity demands, but now we add this dimension to the army and alas we see a new horizon.
We will be adding some very know off-line groups via affiliates to our Church of Theistic Satanism in the days ahead and many people will notice new clergy and new membership coming in, do not be alarmed for expansion will help us and in this fight we will have the hounds that will make us the most formidable force in Theistic Satanism.

Hail Satan
Grand Magister Blackwood

Who is the victim here?
Sinister or?
Grand Magister Blackwood Leader of Theistic Satanism

The definitive answer is The Satanic Community!
Now some people can deny a community even exists and it does, but it doesn’t flourish nor does it grow, due in part to the dogma of several groups dedicated to sway mindless individuals from paths they believe in by attacking different groups and leaders verbally, not getting to a core ideology but attacking them like political trolls.

People of the community I think have begun to fight back, as I always have against those who besmirch the name of Satan (even though the name is human construct) and a much older Satan provides us evidence to our very historical roots.

People within several fringe groups have begun to fake screen names like my own and Aquino and Boyd Rice and speaking for these individuals causing them to move underground for their efforts.

Now I personally disagree with La Vey but he did bring some people out of the proverbial closet and allow some semblance to forming churches and speaking about Satanism.
Years ago Diana Vera, and myself along with the Joy Of Satan and Wynter rolled out Theistic Satanism, and because of our efforts it has moved forward.

So I tell new Satanist’s that be careful who you believe and always fact check those who are speaking out against certain individuals, as the continuation of fake books and screen name’s increase so will discord and fighting amongst creating to their chagrin discord amongst the leaders and groups that reign in Satanism.

We must root out those who seek to tie Islam to Satanism and begin to create more perfect ideologies based not on lunatic madmen like Anton Long, also known as David Myatt, and brandish those who do nothing but create mindless zombies following nothingness.

People ask me what have you done, what are you doing and why has your group been inactive, well notice this people are talking about me allot, this is due in part to the fear of me and what I can uncover to the media, or to fellow Satanist’s, like I said I am not a Messiah just deeply rooted in my faith a warrior and no dogma stands safe to my examination as Satan would want it.

Perhaps we can spend more time on working together for Satan and teaching the new people not creating web prescience’s to attack Aquino or me, or John or Tani, or the countless others who have stood up and spoke about Satanism.

No one is scared of the Order of Nine Angles and the W.S.A. 352 but they are sure obsessed with fighting with me getting several people banned from sites and keeping the garbage flowing but who cares?

My reputation stands for itself like me or not I warn the W.S.A. 352 and the Hoax New Order of Nine Angles that if Myatt comes to America he will be buried here as well, we don’t support terrorist’s in Satanism and because some mindless kids do doesn’t make Myatt safe, he has spread hatred and claims of destruction, trust me we will show him a grave someday.

Violence?
Murder?
No just a promise, not over his form Satanism, however over the things his group has done by blowing up children and supporting terrorism, and as I begin I will reprint the letter sometime this week or next as I am needing to scan it and stay tuned it will blow you away Satanist’s.

As always when Associates speak for these groups like the W.S.A. 352 Associates not tied to Myatt other than in mental slavery, a behavior the strong in our ranks laugh about, these groups forge page after of page of information designed to attack people by creating fake pictures, innuendos and false stories of the same kind seen in the political blogs of the mindless.

Perhaps its time we take back Satanism and quit being lazy and doing nothing but watching the fireworks, not me I will start the fire, fight the fire and extinguish the fire, but I can use your help.

Hail Satan
Grand Magister Blackwood

Grand Magister Blackwood Speaks:
As I close certain arguments about Satanism, I realize we are all innately different, so I have decided
to break a few things behind the Temples of Satan Ideology down for the general public.
Some people who have the pleasure of meeting me and discussing their glimpses and ideologies
regarding Satanism, have most certainly found my version very palatable and understandable.
While many of us are on different quests down the “Proverbial Path”, we are going in different
directions, that hinders growth and requires some semblance of order.
Myatt and his “Band of Order of Nine Angle’s” sheep must be silenced, so youth do not come to
Satanism and seek the ways of Islam and Satanism co-mingled. The Order of Nine Angles, as most
noted Satanic Leaders agree, has recently seen an up-surge in interest, while the founder has lost
interest making them weak at the very best.
There once was a man who sold books that everyone had to have in their collection, Crowley, but after
reading his works they appear to mix many religions together.
The Order of Nine Angles is also like that with spokespersons like Micheal Ford and others, beating a
“Dead Horse” that is obsessed with attacking my organization. Yet the associates are the only ones
involved and we know from the very words of David Myatt, that he exclaimed on numerous occasions
that only he can and will speak for the Order of Nine Angles. Yet his people refuse to follow his wishes,
even making up falsehoods of his return to Satanism.
Most of us who have been around for awhile know while Myatt is submerged in Islam, and sworn his
life to that religion, his return will never be relevant and without conflict. You do not leave Islam
unscathed, especially when you delve deep in the religion, penalties can even include death.
However I am aware with threats to harm Western Society from Myatt, that we need to root out and
expose people who are tied in with this terrorist. Myatt on numerous occasions has threatened the lives
of people who Fight for Freedom, and we cannot let such elements regain a foothold within Satanism.
The Order of Nine Angles will not gain Myatt back, and will not move forward despite efforts of
numerous people who have subscribed to this ideology. That is like a Circus with aliens, traveling
through space, bizarre symbols and regalia that is filled with Islam comparatives, having nothing to do
with Satanism at all.
But back to finality and where we are going today-
I get a few questions throw at me time and time again and I will answer them tonight along with a few
other important things that need to be exposed.
So you ask, in twenty plus years, what have I personally accomplished?
I have found my faith and helped hundreds of others find theirs. Faith is not a Christian term, neither
are many terms that Satanism toss around as bad as they claim.
I established many groups allowing information exchange amongst one another in Satanism. Where I
have failed, is at times not revealing everything to the world as we know it. This is because each
individual requires almost a form of consulting, on which direction he or she is winding down the path.
Some groups have worked, others have not. There is a reason for much of this as well. I built off-line
contacts and ignored some of my on-line contacts, where as others worked solely on-line. I was weak
in this area. I have made many changes over the years, including a sort of, “musical chairs” amongst
board members, and clergy, all trying to place emphasis on Purity and Excellence in Satanism.
Something we all could most certainly use.
While I have not always told people everything, and lead a sordid path as many of us have, involved
in everything from drugs, to prostitution, I have traveled towards my discovery. The personal path
changes I have made, have never took me away from my deities army as a soldier.
I have had the resources and financing to travel along with my current business, (an expedite
business) Which is prospering from the guidance of my faith, and devotion to Satan. Even ‘Satan’ being
a man made name derivative, many of us who are truly adept, know his true name.
I look forward to better days ahead, as new blood comes to my organization, and my appearances in
media become more prevalent, I can educate people not on some “messiah like” doctrine, or with
designs that attract anarchist’s or those exploring mysticism, but Truth, and Purity and Excellence.
As American youths migrate from traditional Christianity and move towards Vampires and darkness,
we find ourselves at the very doorstep in Satanism of growth. However, we remain stifled by ‘messiahs’
and those who wish to mislead people, reformulating LaVey or Crowley and repackaging old diatribe
as new, and changing it’s essence to what appeals to youth. Yet it explains nothing about our very roots.
See, I have always advocated individual study and a gathering of vast vessels of knowledge,
Encouraging the reader to beware of the detrimental doctrines of misguided messiahs like Myatt, that
permeate Satanism and destroy its very value system. Leaving a series of spokespersons to speak not
for his original ideologies, but to sell and brainwash those who have entered afresh, into the religion of
Satanism.
Back to what I conceive or wish to convey, to all the critics and zealots that have spent years trying to
take me down with countless failures. I see Satanism as a individual, and spiritual journey, that requires
one to place faith in the deity, and not listen to a rung of messiahs who speak for Satan.
While I have encountered and spoke with our deity as many have before me, and many more will,
today we know that his vision for Earth is not one of darkness and destruction, but one of personal and
spiritual growth. First for the benefit of the faithful, then the benefit of the deity.
We do not serve our deity as the messiahs that pretend to explain him, we simply act as soldiers in a
vast army. We require as training personal growth, and understanding not only of magic, but his roots
as well. We being simply soldiers to him, perhaps do not know our perfect path. We are allowed the
freedom to explore, so we can better serve, not as slaves, but as soldiers for his eventual return.
I believe we do not need magic in order to perform magic. Most of us develop certain innate powers,
that enable us to perform at a level far above those who fail to recognize the deity, and have decided to
worship themselves or some space aliens from a no where.
Magic could be anything we are able to do that is powerful, love even can be magical. While many
toil over component lists and requirements to perform spells or incantations, I do not. I operate in a
realm most magician will never understand. I have faith, that allows me to discover and develop my
powers daily as many of you do, but the strength emanates from faith in the deity.
While the deity doesn’t always give us badges or powers as the skeptics will scream, he does give us a
reason to believe. With such a path to follow, what one does with it is on them. If one seeks the deity,
the deity will unveil himself to them and not hand them a set of scrolls, or books, or ideologies written
in the hand of man, but in his words. Coming to those most in-tune, quite often.
So, are you confused yet?
Spirituality is personal and not to be reigned over by any one man. As I consider myself a leader,
everyday new leaders discover the deity and move forward, seeking to become the leaders of
tomorrow. As Aquino, Allee, and I find ourselves growing older, we find ourselves not closed minded
to changes. We are cautious, because as we complain and explain we remember we once found
ourselves amongst people we disagreed with, and as they passed the torch to us, we pass it unto you,
the next people to move Satanism forward.
While I desire no book until I retire, I find myself attacked by the youth who fake books. All in an
attempt to discredit me and my organization. However perhaps its payback since once I did the same,
and challenged the adepts. I still do but not for them being fat or skinny, but for what they attempted to
become messiah’s over.
Satanism is interwoven with many types of people, and yet we lack basic fundamentals. For anyone to
think it has ever been different, is a lie. I can tell you even with some success myself, and many others,
we still need work.
I have dedicated my life to the deity and I have never designed anything within it to mislead. I have
reached out for power in my youth but now in my older days I seek understanding of the roots and
convey this. I am very misunderstood for such, but I leave the work of changing the religion to the
youth. Be aware, as I serve my deity, I serve with a sword so tempered with wisdom and faith, that
when the enemy is slain with it they cannot ever return.
People remain silent but not me, I speak out often and yet all I get from some people is rhetoric and
hatred. People call me thanking me for the awakening, and that is what I expect the deity would want.
Not from a messiah, but from a man who fears no enemy and carries his sword proudly.
My very title ‘Grand Magister’, bestowed by The Temples of Satan, means ‘Occult Teacher’, and as I
see high priests, and high priestesses springing up, I see people grasping for power. Amongst the very
few that remain enlightened, and faithful to the deity.
As time has guided me away from teaching, I will never forget as students moved past me and
evolved themselves, not because I was a great teacher but I had faith. Something more powerful than
any false or made up doctrines.
I have made mistakes from sleeping with clergy in my own church, to thinking I was able to take over
some groups. Finding myself the one being laughed at for being lied to. Yet here I am with you,
standing side by side, sword drawn. With faith as the blade that pierces the hearts and minds of the
critics. While my grammar lacks, and I may not be Brad Pitt, our deity cares nothing of psychical
beauty, but of faith and devotion.
I have always been first and foremost involved, even if at times more on-line than off-line. Because of
huge distances between those truly devoted the Net has served me well. Also being a pulpit for the
critics who have attacked me and my membership, for years even causing havoc amongst my clergy,
yet I, as many, remain battle weary, but not beaten by any means.
Faith is not just of Christianity, it is a word owned by no one, except someone who uses it to describe
how they feel about their deity, and the requirements of being a Satanist. It allows them to use, and of
course develop, the power they have gained from themselves indirectly through the deity.
We as Satanist’s have seen our rank’s infiltrated by everything from, Conspiracy Theorists to Islamic
Zealots. Those who have faith have shrugged this off, (you know who you are), and I have had the
pleasure to shake hands and have a beer with many throughout the United States and once in Canada.
I recall the days when my former organization was growing, and I saw a sort of servitude happening.
Taking full advantage of it then, I now feel almost sad because of the crimes I committed. As I even
drifted from my faith at times, I am truly sorry that I used the former organization as a platform and
ignored the purpose. When I founded the Temples of Satan, I did something different, I founded it in
my faith along with others, who shared the same ideologies. Even as we differ, we still have faith.
As there are different faiths, a lot of us are very different. We are not descendants of any Abrahamic
Religion such as Islam, Christianity or Judaism, our deity came from the desert of Ancient Sumeria. As
many provide falsehoods of the region, we are dedicated to faith first, and exploration second. As we
piece parts, and scrolls and glyphs together, many questions remain unanswered. I often ask, “Who are
these messiahs to speak for my deity?”
I share my experiences but don’t claim power because of them. I am very well educated and garner a
high intellect, but I am not a messiah, and I didn’t see anyone like Myatt receive a diploma in the
teachings of Satan. So I have, as many others, deemed the writings of the Order on Nine Angles
irrelevant to Satanism, as I have the Church of Satan.
I will give them the awareness badge and say they accomplished a lot, but in Atheism, with
establishment of people acting like a God or Goddess. This ideology has hurt Satanism from the
creation of Gods and Goddesses, we have bore people who infiltrate Theistic Satanism with a lust to
create combat and chaos, while showing no interest in the deity or faith itself.
I have found myself amongst the people in Satanism both on-line and off-line, and find myself
wondering why LaVey and his ideologies have held in the minds of people so strongly. I have found
that all in all, people enjoy creating a false form of darkness to scare off people, or create a dreamland
of being a vampire. All the while shouting how they are so strong. This is due in part, to the the short
comings of Satanism, and a lack to deliver a message or information, to a large audience, without
brainwashed Modern Satanist’s attacking or discrediting you.
Once again I go back to faith, your faith and your choice. I am not a messiah, I am a leader, a teacher,
but most of all I am a Theistic Satanist.
Hail Satan
Grand Magister Blackwood

Myatt in Islamic Garb

Grand Magister Blackwood Debunks Kayla of the 352….
The Great ONA Hoax

“ People still think of, talk about, and follow David Myatt… even if he was a Nazi Thug… even if he was a Muslim… Even if he denies being a Satanist public-ally. There are still thousands that know Myatt, thousands that look up to him, in whose minds he is a fixture.

Blackwood: In general the adepts of Satanism feel Myatt is a buffoon and he has a few dozen people who really are lost in his ideology.
I have investigated this man and his ideologies and find them irrelevant to Satanism, the Temples of Satan would actually kill this man should he ever reach our shores.

Who talks about Michael Aquino of the TOS these days? Who even knows what he spoke of or taught? How many people in my generation (15-25) even know who or what he is? How many care? As the Monkee Armada advised – “Every Monkey Falls. Watch Out For the Branches.” Aquino fell and hit every branch on his way down into nothingness.

Blackwood: A terrorist with an inane hatred for Western Civilization could never compare to the relevance of Aquino, and even as I bite my tongue La Vey or even myself.
We have stood for Satanist’s he has left Satanist’s for a form of terrorist based Islam, this is unacceptable to any sane Satanist’s.

LaVey is gone… he’s nothing but a trinket the Gilmore Goons of the CoS sells now. Aquino is nobody today… but people still fear Myatt.

Blackwood: I do not fear him and as I have stated many would destroy him just for being a Islamic Terrorist, I have proof he will never return to Satanism that I will unveil on my Real Satanic Site soon along with several planned interviews I will expose this man, not for the knowledgeable individuals but for the youth who haven’t matured yet to know this man was a figment of a bad birth.
And no one fear this pint size Caveman. (see picture).

It’s been some 30-40 years, and David Myatt still reigns the Sinister. ”  Kayla, WSA352
Hardly Myatt has no magical relevance and his works pale at best to Aquino and even some of my private writings, Myatt has many sheep that post information hoping he will return like some messiah that would be sacrificed by horrific sacrificial rites.
Sinister no! Silly yes look at this frail man’s picture!
Islamic Garb?

Hail Satan

From the Desk of Grand Magister Blackwood
© The Temples of Satan Founder and Leader of Theistic Satanism

In the recent few days people who support the Terrorist David Myatt have been attempting to besmirch my name in Theistic Satanism, and activity I would expect from immature or misguided youth.
With hours of time on their hands to create and provide fake photo’s and even now fake books, and issue we are addressing currently with the self publishing site Lulu.

I would not use the self publishing site for a book, perhaps a E-book but not at this time.
I would like to offer to those who have purchased the hoax or fake books a one hundred percent refund as a statement that they cannot win.

As always people who think things are real especially the Hoax Order of Nine Angle will often refuse to leave their ideologies behind as numerous people have exposed this group as a fraud.

With a founder who converted to Islam, nothing is more laughable to the educated Satanist, but when looking over the people who are involved in spoofing my writings, and creating false books on my accord we find a group of sordid individuals who after investigation and interview is comprised of youth.

Do not believe the deceivers in Satanism, the Order of Nine Angle’s as always its a loose group of people who wish to support terrorism, with a cowardly group of people pushing an agenda filled with falsehoods.
As the Leader of Theistic Satanism I will continue with Satan’s guidance to expose such groups to benefit of the community, as most of us know Satan has no use for Islam, or those supporting such.

Faking books and papers is also something very Christian and has no place in the Occult World.

Hail Satan
Grand Magister Blackwood
www.templesofsatan.org
© 2010